Atheist mythology debunked - the inherent predisposition of matter to create life.

Is matter inherently predisposed to produce life on Earth, and elsewhere in the universe, whenever conditions permit it?
And if it is, where does that predisposition come from?

Atheists and most evolutionists believe life originated by entirely natural processes. They believe, and present to the public as a scientific fact, the discredited notion of abiogenesis - which is life arising of its own volition (by natural, chemical processes) from sterile matter. This is similar to the ancient idea of the spontaneous generation of life, which was a fairly common belief before it was soundly refuted by scientists such as Francesco Redi and Louis Pasteur.

Dedicated observational and experimental scientific research, over many centuries, resulted in the Law of Biogenesis. This law, which has never been falsified, rules out the spontaneous generation of life (so-called abiogenesis) as impossible, it says that life only comes from existing life. This is now the reliable basis of medical and food hygiene, and is confirmed by other branches of science, such as Information Theory, the Law of Entropy (based on the Second Law of Thermodynamics), the Laws of Probability and Law of Cause and Effect.

So, is it possible that chemistry or physics (the physical interaction of matter and energy) can produce biology?
The properties of biology and life are completely different to those of chemistry and physics. Life embodies, not just natural laws, as in physics and chemistry, but also complex, constructive information - stored and expressed through the DNA code. Biology has its own unique properties, such as self-replication, which chemistry and physics don’t possess.
The behaviour of natural things is entirely dependent on their inherent properties. They cannot behave in ways that exceed the limits dictated by their own properties. That is the essence of natural laws which describe the scope and limits of the behaviour of natural entities according to their intrinsic properties. For natural laws to change, or not be valid, the intrinsic properties of natural entities, on which they are based, would have to change.

It is a major problem for atheists to explain where natural laws came from, or why they exist?
In a PURPOSELESS universe there should be no regulatory principles at all.
Firstly, we would not expect anything to exist, we would expect eternal nothingness.
Secondly, even if we overlook that impossible hurdle, and assume by some amazing fluke and contrary to logic, something was able to create itself from nothing ….. we would expect that the ‘something’ would have no ordered structure and no laws based on that ordered structure. We would expect it to behave randomly and chaotically.
This is an absolutely fundamental question to which atheists have no answer. The basic properties of matter/energy, and the universe, scream …. ‘purpose’.
Atheists say the exact opposite.

If we consider the atheist belief; that matter is naturally predisposed to produce life and the genetic information for life, whenever environmental conditions are conducive (so-called abiogenesis), the question arises of where that predisposition for life comes from, and why does such a property exist in a purposeless universe?

The idea that the origin of life is just an inevitable consequence of the right conditions – the right chemistry or interaction of matter and energy - is routinely presented by atheists and evolutionists as a scientific fact. They believe that is how life on Earth originated - and also that life is likely to exist elsewhere in the universe, for the very same reason.
For this to be true, matter/energy would have to be inherently predisposed for the potential production of life, whenever conditions are conducive and - therefore, some sort of natural law/plan/blueprint for the creation of life would have to be an intrinsic property of matter. A basic principle of science (and common sense) is that an effect can never be greater than that which causes it. In this case the effect - LIFE - could not be greater than that which atheists allege caused it, i.e. the random interaction of matter and raw energy and chemical processes. So, there has to be a directive principle existing as an intrinsic property of matter that endows it with the ability to create life.

Thus, atheists are left with an impossible dilemma – if life originates as a natural result of the inherent properties of matter, i.e. a natural predisposition for life, they have to explain where that predisposition for life comes from?
It would not be possible for matter to have such a property in a purposeless universe. Therefore, the atheist belief in a natural origin of life, denotes purpose in the universe which atheists deny. This then, is a classic catch 22 situation for atheists.
Atheists cannot have it both ways, if there is no purpose in the universe, matter cannot possibly have an inherent predisposition to produce life.
Thus the atheist belief in ‘no purpose’ also means there is no possibility of a natural origin of life.
The denial of purpose negates a natural origin of life.

Therefore, if atheists insist on claiming a natural origin of life, they are also obliged to admit to the existence of 'purpose' in the universe.

This means, either the idea of a purposeless universe is effectively debunked, or the idea of a natural origin of life is debunked - which is it?
Atheists can take their choice?
Either way, atheism is effectively debunked.
To believe in abiogenesis means that atheism is wrong.
To not believe in abiogenesis also means atheism is wrong.
Conclusion: atheism is wrong - period.

Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=znXF0S6D_Ts&list=TLqiH-mJoVPB...
______________________________________________
____________________________________________
"I believe that the more thoroughly science is studied, the further does it take us from anything comparable to atheism"
"If you study science deep enough and long enough, it will force you to believe in God"
Lord William Kelvin.
Noted for his theoretical work on thermodynamics, the concept of absolute zero and the Kelvin temperature scale.

The Law of Cause and Effect is a fundamental principle of the scientific method. Science literally means 'knowledge'. Knowledge about the natural world is gained through seeking adequate causes for every natural occurrence. An uncaused, natural ocurrence, is a completely, unscientific notion.

The law of Cause and Effect is unlike other natural laws, it is a fundamental principle of the universe and everything in the natural realm. It does not rely on any particular properties of nature/matter/energy, other than the fact that it applies (without exception) to everything which is temporal, i.e. everything that has a beginning.
Concerning the Law of Cause and Effect, one of the world's greatest scientists, Dr. Albert Einstein wrote: “All natural science is based on the hypothesis of the complete causal connection of all events”
Albert Einstein. The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Hebrew University and Princeton University Press p.183

FOUNDATIONS OF SCIENCE
The Law of Cause and Effect. Dominant Principle of Classical Physics. David L. Bergman and Glen C. Collins
www.thewarfareismental.net/b/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/b...

"The Big Bang's Failed Predictions and Failures to Predict: (Updated Aug 3, 2017.) As documented below, trust in the big bang's predictive ability has been misplaced when compared to the actual astronomical observations that were made, in large part, in hopes of affirming the theory."
kgov.com/big-bang-predictions

Taken on: October 18, 2015

Tags:

Darwinism has failed

atheist religion

atheist mythology

militant atheism

religion of naturalism

A C Grayling

Dr brian Cox

Professor Alice Roberts

abiogenesis

evolution

the Dawkins Delusion

Darwinism

darwinian

richard dawkins

neo darwinism

evidence for God

creator God

pagan revivalism

paganism

pagan gods

atheism and paganism

pagan naturalism

supernatural first cause

atheist religion of naturalism

natural laws

law of cause and effect

laurence Krauss

chrisopher hitchens

christianity

christian

Jesus

Creator

creationism

science and christianity

secular humanist

secular humanism

secular society

Humanist association

humanist manifesto

British Humanist Association

Humanist

microbes to human evolution

british humanist society

atheist crimes against humanity

law of biogenesis

daniel denton

Stephen Fry

Bertrand russell

Dr Guy Berthault

stephen Hawking

einstein

intelligent design

the grand design

the blind watchmaker

the God Delusion

Charles Darwin

Sam Harris

creation science

creationist

neo darwinist

Kate Smurthwaite

Winchester Skeptics

philip pullman

Darwin Day lecture

Richard Dawkins Foundation for reason and science

London School of Economics

RDFRS

skeptics in the pub

camp quest

QED con

SitP

Stephen Law

TAMlondon

truth in science « less

Sets appears in: • Atheist myths debunked • The evolution scam more » • Atheism - the religion of naturalism. « less

Groups appears in: • Atheism • !FlickrSoup for Soul more » • #flickr • !Social Issues • `No Rules! • *Really Unlimited* • * Religion * • ANYTHING & EVERYTHING PHOTOGRAPHIC / NO SL/AI • ::Flickr IS my blog:: • Agnostics • Darwinism • ! ART & PHOTOGRAPHY ! All artistic works welcome • "I AM TELLING YOU A STORY HERE. CAN YOU SEE IT?" • "Unlimited Photos: No Rules" (NO AI, CGI or SL images) • (No limits) • "THE WORLD IN FLICKR" (NEW RULES) • ! ♡ Flickrian ♡ No Rules:) Feel Free to invite your Friends! • A Quiet Revolt • Darwinism and evolution • ! Flickr Cafe ! • ! F l i c k r | S t y l e ! • ! Flickr Lover ! • ! The Flickr ! • "NO RULES" Group...All kind of Great Shots are invited... • !Excellent Photos • ` FLICKR ´ • *Infinite Images • * Everybodys Photo Group *(All Welcome) • *** We Are The Word *** • !*ALL ARE WELCOME*! • !*Flickr All Stars*! • DARWINISM HAS FAILED « less

Stats: 7,967 views / 7 comments

go back

Link to this photo view:
Link to this photo large view: